If you're shopping for a new mattress and want one that's soft and comfortable yet also provides support and some firmness, look no further! A hybrid mattress may be the perfect choice for you as it is the best of both worlds; it combines layers of soft and cushy memory foam with a traditional innerspring system for a unique feel and excellent support. Read on to find out more about the distinguishing features and pros and cons of this layered mattress and why it has become a popular choice in the world of mattresses.
What Is a Hybrid Mattress?
A hybrid mattress is a unique type of mattress that combines memory foam and an innerspring system to provide multi-layered support and comfort.
Hybrid mattresses are a relatively new concept so maybe you've never heard of them, or have seen the name but aren't exactly sure what they are. They have become a popular choice thanks to the fact that they blend together support and comfort in a unique, layered way that no other mattress type does.
A hybrid mattress features the traditional construction of an innerspring mattress, which means that the bottom layer is made up of coils which in this case are usually individually pocketed. The coils are what gives a mattress that bouncy feel as well as breathability and firmness. Since a hybrid features this traditional system but is topped with layers of foam, it falls into the medium-firm mattress category, which is something to keep in mind when shopping.
The top layer of the mattress is memory foam, which is beneficial in many ways, but comfort is the first and greatest of them. The foam creates a comfortable cushion that forms around your body and helps you to rest and relax, therefore improving your sleep quality. The foam texture allows your body weight to be evenly distributed, which means that there is less pressure on your spine, back and neck, making it a great choice for anyone with chronic pain in those areas. If you are concerned about the mattress retaining too much body heat because of the memory foam layer, there are hybrid mattresses that are made with a gel layer that's specifically designed to have a cooling effect and counteract the heat-retaining properties of memory foam.
Pros and Cons
There are several key advantages and disadvantages to a hybrid mattress that are important to consider when deciding what type of mattress is best for you. Some of the key advantages are the comfort that it provides and its ability to distribute body weight, so if you suffer from chronic pain or want a mattress that's not extremely firm, this is a good choice. While hybrid mattresses have a relatively high price point because they are still quite new and considered trendy, they are durable and a good investment that will last for several years. They also don't require a box spring like many traditional mattresses do, so that is one less expense to have to think about.
Despite these advantages, if you're looking for a highly firm mattress or worry about the memory foam layer being too hot while you're sleeping, then this may not be the right option for you. As with any mattress, the best way to find out what's best for you is to test it out for yourself. Try a couple of different mattresses and see what the level of firmness, bounce and cushion suits you best so that you can be sure you'll be getting the best night's sleep possible.
It's not too firm or too soft, but perfectly in between.
It's well suited for different kinds of sleepers —back, side and stomach sleepers.
It works to alleviate aches and pains.
The innerspring system helps the mattress to last for longer.
It doesn't require a box spring.
It tends to be more expensive than other mattresses.
It doesn't provide extreme firmness if that's something you're looking for.
Depending on its quality, the memory foam top can begin to sag over time.
Not every mattress labeled "hybrid" is a true hybrid mattress, so make sure you do your research.
Ancuelle, Victor et al. Effects of an adapted mattress in musculoskeletal pain and sleep quality in institutionalized elders. Sleep Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 115-120, 2015. doi:10.1016/j.slsci.2015.08.004